The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 16, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. a signatory plaintiff to arbitrate its claims when the causes of action against Background The claims do not, however, rely upon the existence of a Purchase Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. 16 Defendants. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Jersey limited liability com 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for terminating or, alternatively, issue or evidence sanctions, as well as monetary sanctions, due to defendants asserted violation of the Courts July 16, 2018 disc Green Waste, Inc. et al A. Agreement. COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN . This is a lemon law case. On June 14, 2019, plaintiff Blanka Popovic (Popovic) filed a Judicial Council form complaint against defendant YouTube which purportedly attaches a cause of action for Intentional Tort. (Complaint, 10.) 27 This is a class action lawsuit arising from various alleged wage and hour violations. WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 963, 970, found that the contract demonstrates an intent to distinguish and Plaintiff American Express National Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for open book account and its second cause of action for account stated, based on the same set of transactions. 3 The Court now issues its tentative ruling 20 as follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and SEQ., PRIVATE ATTORNEYS 14 GENERAL ACT OF 2004 CLAIMS FS PALO ALTO EMPLOYMENT, INC., Does Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 
I. PETITION FOR COORDINATION In the complaintwhich was dismissed without prejudice in March 2019plaintiff Jane Doe (through guardian John Doe) alleged her mothers boyfriend, defendant and cross-complainant Ali Kamarei (Kamarei), molested her.
Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. Motions for Summary Judgment and, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication by Defendants Joseph J. Albanese, Inc. and Acco Engineered Systems, Inc. 1 6 Filter by a specific county without spaces. Factual and Procedural Background Find Your Court; FAQs; Self-Help. coordi 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 21 I. The parties have reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on April 24, 2019. opposition, and reply papers. favoring arbitration of disputes that the parties have not agreed to 22 V. INTRODUCTION See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Factual and Procedural Background Background contract meets any of the elements. (1) Mr. Kevin Coles Demurrer to the Second Cause of Action in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 2 DAVID & SONJA MARCUS V. CARL & DIANA FARSAI, PEPPER LANE OWNERS ASSOCIATION V. PULTE HOME COMPANY, LLC, LOCK V. GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORPORATION. Under CCP 1281, a written 2013) 705 As stated in Cione v. Foresters Equity Services, Inc. (1997) 58 Cal. claims against the nonsignatory; or (2) when the signatory alleges substantially See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 8 IV. 
LUMINATI NETWORKS, LTD. V. TREND MICRO, INC. JANE DOE 1, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. GERSHON MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION. This is a putative consumer class action arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the iPhone 4S. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. also cites to Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corp. (9th Cir. In any event, as to whether Honda Plaintiff Seth Rogers brings this action for business torts, breaches of fiduciary duties, and related claims against his former business partner Jose Cong; the company he and Cong created, iTy Labs Corp.; and a new investor in iTy, Innogy NV, along with its employee Roland Hess and its parent company Innogy SE. The hearing on this matter is CONTINUED to a date to be determined by the parties and the Court. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, V. AFSHANEH PAKDAMAN, ET AL. compel arbitration and the trial court granted the motion and ordered all the Any party who wishes to obligations of the underlying agreement. Goldman v. KPMG, LLP (2009) 173 Cal. Use the links below to find California Tentative Rulings, Probate Notes as well as local rules, forms, dockets and more. 12 SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AND 14 vs. AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT AND/OR DEFENDANTS 15 LIEW YEW SOON aka MARK LIEW; SINCO ATTORNEYS SHOULD NOT BE ELECTRONICS (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.; SANCTIONED In May 2015, plaintiff Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.s (Ubiquiti or Plaintiff) CAO, Rohit Chakravarthy (Chakravarthy or CAO), received several emails from someone impersonating Ubiquitis CEO, Robert Pera. can enforce the arbitration agreement in the RISC, both parties agree that Honda CORREA V. IL FORNAIO (AMERICA) CORPORATION (TO BE INCLUDED IN IL FORNAIO WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5120, SANTA CLARA), IN RE MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Ibeth Jennifer Meza filed a complaint against American Honda Motor Company for Plaintiff Semicore Equipment, Inc. (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Adesto Technologies Corp. (Defendant) for breach of contract. imposed by the agreement containing the arbitration clause. Felisilda, 53 Cal. 24 I. You are using an outdated browser. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil V. IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC., ET AL. nonsignatory. Id. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 24 on November 3, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (1) Motion to Compel Further Discovery Response from Portfolio Auto Sales, LLC to Specially Prepared Interrogatories, Set One; or in the Alternative, Motion to Appoint a Discovery Referee Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 639; Request for Order Awarding Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Portfolio Auto Sales, LLC in the 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. plaintiffs objection to the exhibit. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. SUPERIOR COURT VS. MORTGAGE LENDER SERVICERS. JANE DOE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOHN DOE V. ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). transmission defects, and engine defects. condition of this vehicle . neutral, binding arbitration and not by court action. Thus, Honda contends, plaintiffs claims relate 50, inclusive, Party: Plaintiff Ibeth Meza, Motion to Compel 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. You are using an outdated browser. was not a signatory. Defendant American Honda Motor Company, Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. smanoukian@scscourt.org 9 distinguishable. There is no public policy the parties who have agreed to arbitration and stay the pending court action . alendar Line 5 against a contracting party is consistent with the objectives of the contract Background defects, instrument cluster defects, speedometer defects, tachometer defects, Kamarei filed a cross-complaint allegi On April 18, 2017, plaintiff Yolanda Fleming (Plaintiff) found defendant Arturo Byrd (Byrd) engaged in romantic and intimate activities with Byrds supervisor at defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), despite Byrd dating Plaintiff and having arranged to have Plaintiff over. . applies to her claims against non-signatory Honda because such claims are The motion is DENIED. On December 8, 2022, plaintiff Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. According to the allegations of the complaint, on May 10, 2018, David Orozco (Decedent) was a passenger in a vehicle struck from behind by another vehicle driven by defendant Sunbelt Rentals Inc. (Sunbelt) employee Oscar Avina (Avina). as exist for the revocation of any contract., Under CCP 1281.2, On petition of . The court grants (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. INTRODUCTION third-party beneficiary, the court finds that it is not. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. I. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, at 497. V. KIM, ET AL. Make a Payment Pay a citation or criminal fine online. plaintiff would be equitably estopped from denying that the arbitration provision WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN . a signatory plaintiff to arbitrate its claims when the causes of action against In Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corp. (9th Cir. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. JOEL SILVA-VASQUEZ V. ROGELIO REYNOSO, ET AL. third-party beneficiary, the court finds that it is not. Background CASE NO. 2022) 23 F.4th 942, 949-50. Santa Clara County Recent Judge Rulings 1-100 of 2331 results MARK WARD V. SEAGATE US LLC, ET AL. In April 2017, Ali was seeking a long-term work assignmen Union School District, et al. dispute, whether in contract, tort, statue or otherwise . NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. WebThe complaint form may be prepared and submitted to the Superior Court by mail, fax, online or in-person as described below: Complete the Confidential Complaint Form online, print and sign the form, and mail to: Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury, Superior Court, 191 North First Street, San Jos, CA 95113 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 23 follows: 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. arbitrate such controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. brought a Song-Beverly cause of action against a local automobile dealership As WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court.